All Posts

Larger fascial bites do not mean better closures. Excessive bite depth drives fat entrapment, SSI risk, and scar tissue formation. This article explains why precision surgical suture tools are a tissue health variable, not just an ergonomic one.

Port site hernia prevention takes on new challenges in bariatric surgery, where larger trocars and higher BMI patients raise the stakes.

Can the Suture Ease device place a figure-of-eight stitch? Get answers to this common fascial suture technique question from our clinical team.

Moving to a semi-automated suture passer system does not have to disrupt your OR. Here is a practical roadmap for making the switch.

Discover proven strategies to reduce trocar site complications, protect patients, and improve surgical outcomes while minimizing avoidable healthcare costs.

Robot-assisted surgery closure is entering a new phase as single-port platforms create larger defects than ever before.

Learn how precise stitch placement during abdominal wall closure can reduce hernia risk, minimize pain, and support better surgical outcomes.

Looking for a Carter Thomason replacement? See how the Suture Ease CrossBow compares on speed, consistency, and OR efficiency backed by clinical data.

The Suture Ease System solves port site closure challenges with reproducible devices. See how the portfolio matches defect, patient, and safety needs.

The data on incisional hernia risk tells a clear story: closure technique matters as much as the surgical platform. Here's what surgeons need to know.

Manual laparoscopic port site closure depends on conditions that rarely exist at the end of a case. This article makes the clinical case for guided closure systems and explains why the transition is no longer optional for high-performing surgical programs.

Port site complications ranging from hernia to SSI and visceral injury share one thing in common: they are preventable. This article maps the root cause behind each complication type and identifies the device-level strategies that address each problem.

Trocar site hernia is a known source of morbidity, with reported incidence in the literature ranging from 1–8%, and it often requires surgical intervention once it occurs.

High-quality minimally invasive instruments are the foundational requirement for successful laparoscopic surgery, providing the control and durability necessary to execute technique-sensitive steps like fascial closure. By utilizing instruments built to exacting standards, surgical teams can minimize mechanical drift and ensure consistent suture placement, which is critical for preventing complications like tissue entrapment or nerve involvement.

For surgical coordinators, O.R. efficiency tools aren’t “nice extras.” They are the difference between a schedule that stays on track and a day that drifts case by case.

Fascial closure is one of the most variable steps in a laparoscopic procedure, and that variability has a measurable dollar cost. This article breaks down where manual closure loses time and how automated systems recover it.

Suture passer design affects more than comfort. It affects closure consistency, placement accuracy, and surgeon performance across a full surgical day. This article explains what purpose-built design requires and why it matters clinically.

The Carter-Thomason suture passer has been an O.R. fixture for decades, but familiarity is not the same as optimal performance. This article examines where the standard design falls short and what a purpose-built replacement delivers.

Directed fascial closure represents a shift from "blind" suture placement to a high-precision technique that specifically targets the fascial layer while excluding subcutaneous fat and muscle. In laparoscopic bariatric surgery, this method addresses the common postoperative complications of 12 mm trocar sites—namely chronic pain and incisional hernias—by ensuring sutures are accurately positioned and retrieved under direct visualization.

A laparoscopic closure system is a specialized instrument engineered to streamline the final stage of minimally invasive surgery, directly reducing the duration of general anesthesia. By replacing technically demanding manual suturing with predictable, intuitive technology, these systems complete trocar-site closure in an average of 87.9 seconds, significantly faster than the 128-second average for hand suturing.